Free men believe that separating from their front man or refusing to be identified as such allows them to escape their legal obligations and responsibilities. This is usually attempted by denying that they are a «person» in the same way as their front man, or spelling out their name in a non-standard way, using red ink and putting fingerprints on court documents. [14] The straw man theory (also called the straw man illusion) is a pseudo-legal theory that prevails in various movements such as the sovereign citizen, the tax protester, the free man in the countryside and the redemption movement. The theory is that an individual has two personalities, one of flesh and the other a separate legal entity (i.e. «the straw man»). The idea is that an individual`s debts, obligations, taxes, and legal responsibilities belong to the straw man rather than the physical individual. [1] The straw man theory is recognized by law as a fraud: the FBI considers anyone who promotes it a likely fraud[2]; The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) considers this a frivolous argument and supports people who use the theory in their federal tax returns. [3] [4] The main application of the straw man theory is to escape and deny debts, obligations and legal responsibility. Tax protesters, «trade repayment» and «debt outflow» scams claim that debt and taxes are the responsibility of the straw man and not the real person. They support this assertion by misinterpreting the legal definition of a person[8] and misinterpreting the distinction between a legal person[9] and a natural person. [10] In accepted legal theory, there is a difference between what is called a natural person and that of a legal person. A corporate personality applies to businesses, charities, governments and other recognized organizations. The courts recognize people as «persons,» not as a legal fiction associated with a person of flesh and blood, but as one and the same person.
[11] They never recognized the right to distance oneself from one`s person or the possibility of withdrawing from one`s personality. [12] U.S. birth certificates and other vital statistics documents often include the person`s name in capital letters. Theorists believe that this capitalized version does not represent the natural person, but another version that exists only in legal terms. Straw man is a term used for a technique to argue a problem when a person simply ignores a person`s actual position and replaces a distorted, exaggerated, or distorted version of that position. This strategy works like this: the straw man theory goes back to the ancient Roman legal practice of capitis deminutio («diminishing of the head»), a term used in Roman trials to erase a person`s previous legal capacity. Capitis deminutio minima meant that a person ceased to belong to a particular family without losing his freedom or citizenship. Capitis deminutio media implied the loss of citizenship and family, but not freedom.
Capitis deminutio maxima involved the loss of family, citizenship, and freedom (i.e. a slave or prisoner of war). [5] The straw man theory usually takes the term capitis deminutio, the spell «capitis diminutio» and claims that capitis diminutio maxima was represented by a person`s name in capital letters. This led to the idea that individuals had their own legal personality, which is now called the «straw man.» [6] The straw man is a third party who in the meantime holds property in order to transfer it to another. In real estate law, a straw man would be the person to whom a grantor transfers land for whatever reason; (sometimes called «front») for the sole purpose of hiding the true owner. Any transaction where one party represents another party in a purchase where ownership is transferred is a straw man transaction. In order to create a suitable common tenancy in which a roommate was already involved, in the past it was first necessary to transfer the property to a straw man and then transfer the interest in the property to the final beneficiaries as roommates. A straw man business was necessary because the beneficiaries had to acquire their interests at the same time in order to form a unit of time and have the unit of ownership (same type of transfer); These two elements form a colocation. What is a straw man in legal terms? It can be two things: the theory says that an individual has two personas. One of them is a natural and tangible person, and the other is the legal person, often referred to as legal fiction. When a baby is born in the United States, a birth certificate is issued and parents apply for a Social Security number.
Sovereigns say the government uses this birth certificate to open a secret financial account, which it funds with an amount of $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular sovereign belief system. Therefore, the rights of each newborn are divided between those of the flesh-and-blood baby and those of the company`s shell account. [1] When a straw man is used in relation to a person, he can play an important role in a jury trial. Using a straw man is essentially circumventing the law to achieve the desired result, which would otherwise be illegal. However, not all workarounds are legal. Some may use a front man to mask illegal activities such as money laundering. Similarly, a straw man can also be used to avoid liability for illegal operations, thus creating another person to take over the case if he is ever caught. Proponents of the straw man theory often use it as an argument that a physical individual has no legal responsibility. They believe that all debts, liabilities, taxes, and other legal obligations belong exclusively to that person`s straw man`s version and therefore have no real relevance to the real person. (A) a federal entity; (B) any agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) a U.S. instrument. [This would include states, counties and cities] Each transaction is now considered by the USA, INCORPORATED as a commercial transaction of shell companies (fiction in law).
What is fiction in law? A fiction in court or a legal fiction is an artificially created entity that is considered only in law. In other words, it is not real, except in the eyes of the law written by men. Legal fictions are the opposite of natural entities such as humans. A created legal fiction is endowed by law to have certain privileges similar to the rights people have, such as the right to own property and to sue and be sued. The most common legal fictions are corporations and trusts. These have been around for some time with their primary purpose of limiting the liability of the people who hold the company or trust, so they can NOT be personally liable for their actions. Legal fictions are incompatible with the common law on which our country was founded. At common law, everyone is responsible for their own actions and is held liable for any wrongdoing (harming others in any way). In 1933, governors from all states met to discuss FDR`s declared state of emergency and to support the new process that had just been introduced. The government was bankrupt and had to be financed in its bankruptcy. The governors promised the United States to fund it. The promise was that people`s wealth and energy would support the government and guarantee the debt.
But there was a small problem. Natural living people cannot mix with legal fictions (corporate), so it was necessary to create a bridge between fictions and people in order to subjugate people and subordinate them to government society. When the governors made this commitment, they agreed to register people`s birth certificates with the U.S. Department of Commerce. The birth certificate is the security instrument (safety) with which the pledge is guaranteed. Legal fiction was created by using the name on the birth certificate and writing it in capital letters, the designation of a legal fiction. Then, because of the commitment, YOU have been appointed to be the guarantor (the one who is responsible for paying) for the legal fiction. So when the government or a company uses a process, they use it against the legal fiction they want YOU to think you are YOU.
